Legal Opinion

Noyes v. Morris

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Albany county. Action by Levi S. Hoyes against Abram Y. Morris, Robert Pelthousen, and others. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint at the trial. The action was brought to set aside certain deeds of conveyauce of real estate, made by Adam W. Kline and Bata A. Kline to Abram Morris, and by Morris to Robert Pelthousen; also to set aside a general assignment by Bata Ann Kline to Julius Wasserman for the benefit of creditors. On the trial the plaintiff put in evidence a deed from Bata A. Kline and Adam W. Kline, her husband, to Abram V. Morris, dated December 8, 1883, conveying the premises described in the complaint, reciting a consideration of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. MacNaughton v. . OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Ogden v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Burnham v. . BrennanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. PlonskyNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kinsella v. City of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Livingston v. Manhattan Railway Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API