Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Plonsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891Published

-Appeal from special term, New York county. ° Action by Edward Colien and Isidore Sonnenthal against Ezekiel Plonsky and Aaron Auspach to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer of bills receivable. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint át the trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The plaintiffs recovered a judgment against the defendant Aaron Auspaeh, upon which an execution, issued to the sheriff of the county in which he resided, against his property, had been returned unsatisfied. This action was then brought to set aside an assignment of bills receivable to the amount of $5,429.58, made by the judgment debtor to the other defendant in the action. It was charged in the complaint that this assignment was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of the debtor. This was denied by the answers of the defendants. When the trial was brought on, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Billings v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Scofield v. . HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Van Derlip v. . KeyserNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Noyes v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rousseau v. BleauNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API