Legal Opinion

United States v. Beszborn

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1994No. 92-2747UnpublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, District Judge:

OPINION

The Government appeals the district court’s decision granting defendants’ motions and dismissing the indictment on the basis of pre-indictment delay and double jeopardy. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Proceedings Below

The Government charged five defendants, James Daniel Beszborn, Joseph Westmore-land, James Purdom, Michael Blanchard, and Martin Schehin with participating in a scheme to defraud First Universal Savings, Meridian Savings Association, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB), and the Internal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. De La Beckwith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. John D. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. AvantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. Benjamin Henderson Jones v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API