Legal Opinion
Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 1, 1965No. 585PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
Montana-Dakota (MDU) is an interstate natural gas pipeline company, selling and transporting gas in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. The lines involved here run to the east and west from the Tioga processing plant in North Dakota, jointly owned by. Amerada and Signal, producers of natural gas in North Dakota. Also, running north from the Tioga point is *688a line extending to the gasoline extraction plants of Hunt-Herbert and TXL (now Texaco), both in North Dakota.
On a peak winter day in 1962-1963 MDU was expected to purchase a total of 70,000 Mcf of North Dakota-produced gas…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Signal Oil and Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, Houston Pipe Line Company and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by18 opinions
- Younger v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Pan American World Airways, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, World Airways, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, Federal Power Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.