Legal Opinion

Cook v. Ross

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. A. J, Booiy.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

If appellant has a meritoria *264ous cause of action, this judgment may no doubt work him an irreparable injury. But the rules and principles of law cannot he varied to meet the supposed equities of every particular case, nor the plain arid positive requirements of the statute regulating its procedure he annulled or set aside by the court to relieve parties from the consequences of their carelessness and neglect. Experience in the'administration of justice between litigants, from “ the time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary,” demonstrates that cases…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ewing v. KinnardTexas Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. De LeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Frazer v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Posey v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Burleson v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Magouirk v. KlasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API