Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burleson v. Rawlins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 1943No. 13486Published

1DissentBond, Chief Justice

I base my dissent on the ground that relator has a clear, adequate remedy at law to effectually secure her rights; and where such exists, this Court is without authority to issue the harsh mandatory injunction to compel the District Judge to perform his discretionary duty. The trial Judge heard the testimony and, from it, made the judicial determination, which he •cannot be made to alter by mandatory command of this Court; his prerogative to make the order should not be interfered with by extrajudicial order of this Court. The trial court, in the exercise 'of judicial discretion, had the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Pinchback v. HocklesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Yett v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Early v. CorneliusTexas Supreme Court · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API