Cooke v. . Cooke
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J., concurring; WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. After stating the case: Subject to the constitutional restriction that "it may not grant a divorce nor secure alimony in any individual case" (Const., Art. II, sec. 10), the question of divorce is a matter exclusively of legislative cognizance, and in the exercise of its powers over the subject the General Assembly of 1907 (chapter 89) added a new cause for absolute divorce, as follows: "If there shall have been a separation of husband and wife, and they shall have lived (275) separate and apart for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cole v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Ellett v. EllettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Edgerly v. EdgerlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Thompson v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Herrick v. HerrickNevada Supreme Court · 1933
- Schuster v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.