Legal Opinion

Cooke v. . Cooke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1913PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J., concurring; WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. After stating the case: Subject to the constitutional restriction that "it may not grant a divorce nor secure alimony in any individual case" (Const., Art. II, sec. 10), the question of divorce is a matter exclusively of legislative cognizance, and in the exercise of its powers over the subject the General Assembly of 1907 (chapter 89) added a new cause for absolute divorce, as follows: "If there shall have been a separation of husband and wife, and they shall have lived (275) separate and apart for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Ellett v. EllettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Edgerly v. EdgerlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Herrick v. HerrickNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Schuster v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API