Legal Opinion

Beran v. Tradesmen's National Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the ■Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 4, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. This action was brought to enforce an alleged assignment of part of a claim set up by the defendant Michael Duffy .against the defendant The Tradesmen’s National Bank. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the ■Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 4, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. This action was brought to enforce an alleged assignment of part of a claim set up by the defendant Michael Duffy .against the defendant The Tradesmen’s National Bank. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. No case can be found "where a party is held to pay a second time money which he Fas paid to a plaintiff or claimant…

1Opinion of the CourtPeckham, J.

Michael Duffy claimed to have a valid demand against the defendant bank to the extent of some forty thousand dollars. The details of that demand are not here important. To collect it, Duffy had commenced an action against the bank, which was pending when the circumstances now to be mentioned occurred. In order to pay a debt which he •bwed to one Iilaber, Duffy assigned to him a portion of his, Duffy’s, demand against the bank, to the extent of ten thousand dollars. This assignment recited the existence of the suit by Duffy against the bank, and after assigning the amount of ten thousand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LaFetra v. Hudson Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Beals v. MayherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Randel v. VanderbiltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API