Legal Opinion

Murray Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.

This is a motion to compel a purchaser in a foreclosure sale to complete its bid. The purchaser refuses on the ground that the title offered by the Referee is not marketable.

This is the second foreclosure action between the identical parties. The first culminated in a sale of the premises to a purchaser styled as ‘1 2-4 Amsterdam Avenue Corp. ’ ’ The judgment of foreclosure and sale, however, was vacated by order of this court due to a defect of parties. Subsequently, the instant foreclosure action was commenced and judgment entered. However, prior to the sale the 2-4 Amsterdam Corp.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whittier Estates, Inc. v. Manhattan Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
  2. Whittier Estates, Inc. v. Manhattan Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edward Hansen, Inc. v. Kearny Post Office Assocs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. Land Resources Development v. Kaiser AetnaNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API