Legal Opinion

Ginnis v. Atlas Painting & Sheeting Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1992No. 91-1638PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Appellants argue that the amendment to R.C. 4123.519, by Am.Sub. H.B. No. 222, 143 Ohio Laws, Part II, 3197, 3353, 3355, effective November 3, 1989, which permits the trial judge to fix an attorney fee up to $2,500 to the claimant’s attorney, does not apply to a workers’ compensation appeal filed in the common pleas court before November 3, 1989. Appellants further contend that the amendment to R.C. 4123.519 contains no clearly expressed legislative intent that it could be applied retrospectively.

In our view, appellants are clearly erroneous in their interpretation of the language of R.C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Anderson v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Sajar Plastics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Perry v. Ltv Steel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Cannon v. Catalytic, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Russell v. McCloudOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API