Legal Opinion

State v. Bryson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 2003No. 3713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, J.:

Jeremy Bryson was indicted and tried for multiple charges, including assaulting a law enforcement officer while resisting arrest in violation of South Carolina Code Annotated section 16-9-320(B) (2003) and pointing a firearm in violation of South Carolina Code Annotated section 16-23-410 (2003). On appeal, Bryson argues the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction for these two offenses because the court allowed *109the amendment of both indictments immediately prior to trial, changing the identity of the law enforcement officer named as the victim in each. We agree with Bryson…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. GunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  4. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. PrimusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API