Legal Opinion
Goldfarb v. Roeger
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 85 (1959)
148 A.2d 189
ABE GOLDFARB, TRADING AS A. GOLDFARB & SON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
WILLIAM D. ROEGER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WILLIAM D. ROEGER, SR. (AND WILLIAM D. ROEGER, JR.), TRADING AS C.F. ROEGER & SON, AND C.F. ROEGER & SON, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 12, 1959.
Decided February 3, 1959.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.
Mr. Theodore Tarter argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hermann, Melnik and Lowengrub, attorneys).
Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for respondent (Mr.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Wilford v. Sigmund Eisner Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Missell v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- GARZA EX REL. FINO v. PaoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jameson v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Davis v. DND/Fidoreo, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Keller v. County of SomersetNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Garley v. WaddingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Union Cty. Savings Bank v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.