Legal Opinion

United States v. Sipes

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 20, 1955No. Crim. No. 15809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

Presented here is whether evidence obtained by search of defendant is admissible. On the date of defendant’s arrest, two federal officers were proceeding in an automobile along a public street in the City of Knoxville, when the driver saw and recognized defendant, then a pedestrian crossing the street. Defendant had a reputation with this officer of being a bootlegger of tax-unpaid whiskey.

*538When the officer saw defendant, the latter was wearing an Army-type blouse or jacket, a garment roomy enough to enclose objects of some size in addition to the body of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Lee HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. CookDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. QuisenberryFairfax County Circuit Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API