Legal Opinion
Lusk v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 27, 1977No. 50051PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice:
Dennis L. Lusk (Lusk), as an automobile passenger, was involved in a two vehicle accident. Lusk made claim for medical payment, resulting from that accident, with the insurer of the automobile Lusk occupied, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). As a condition of payment under the medical payment coverage, State Farm required of Lusk the execution of its loan receipt trust agreement. This type of settlement for that kind of coverage was basically provided for in the insurance policy.
Lusk made settlement with possible negligent third party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Hardberger and Smylie, a Co-Partnership, and William H. Rabe v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- American Motorists Insurance Company v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Hiebert Ex Rel. Hiebert v. Millers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duboise v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Nation v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Nation v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994