Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Tempe, City of

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 17, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00407Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Dustin Matthews, ) No. CV-22-00407-PHX-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) City of Tempe, et al., ) 12 ) 13 Defendants. ) ) 14 ) 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff Dustin Matthews’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Partial 16 Summary Judgement (“MPSJ”) (Doc. 53) and Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 105). The 17 Motions are fully briefed and ready for review. (Docs. 53, 105, 117, 121, 123, 128). Having 18 reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court denies both Motions for the following reasons.1 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 This…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API