Legal Opinion

Coastal Transit Co. v. Springfield Bus Terminal, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 21, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

Each of these suits is for specific performance of a contract for exclusive rights in the plaintiff, which conflict with rights claimed by the plaintiff in the other case. In neither case is the plaintiff in the other case made a party defendant, as would have been the better practice. Butterick Publishing Co. v. Fisher, 203 Mass. 122, 130. Holden v. Efficient Craftsman Corp. 234 N. Y. 437, 440. *515Manchester Ship Canal Co. v. Manchester Racecourse Co. [1901] 2 Ch. 37, 51. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Rogers, 15 Stew. (N. J.) 311. Neither were the cases consolidated in the sense of being…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Bell v. PierschbacherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Miller v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Linse v. O'MEARAMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Paeff v. Hawkins-Washington Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API