Coastal Transit Co. v. Springfield Bus Terminal, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
Each of these suits is for specific performance of a contract for exclusive rights in the plaintiff, which conflict with rights claimed by the plaintiff in the other case. In neither case is the plaintiff in the other case made a party defendant, as would have been the better practice. Butterick Publishing Co. v. Fisher, 203 Mass. 122, 130. Holden v. Efficient Craftsman Corp. 234 N. Y. 437, 440. *515Manchester Ship Canal Co. v. Manchester Racecourse Co. [1901] 2 Ch. 37, 51. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Rogers, 15 Stew. (N. J.) 311. Neither were the cases consolidated in the sense of being…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Bell v. PierschbacherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Miller v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Linse v. O'MEARAMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Paeff v. Hawkins-Washington Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.