Legal Opinion

Reeve v. Shoemaker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Defendant, Shoemaker, sold a lot to Welch. Plaintiff, as surviving partner of her husband, J. B. Reeve, claims that she or her firm secured the purchaser, and is entitled to a commission. Plaintiff produced a book kept by Reeve and herself, in which this lot was listed. She does not claim that the listing was made with her. She offered to testify that, in a conversation between Mr. Reeve and the defendant in June, 1922, overheard by her, “J. B. Reeve advised the defendant that he expected to make a sale of defendant’s lot, and defendant says, ‘All right.’ ” She did not offer to testify that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. Sioux City & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Castner v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Seevers v. Cleveland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Gilbert v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Stevens v. Bailey & HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Windsor v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Armstrong v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Batts v. SnookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Northrup v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Armstrong v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API