Legal Opinion

Keystone State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Sabo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1940No. Appeal, 269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The learned court below correctly ruled that the present case is governed by the principles set forth in our decisions in Braun, Sheriff, to use of Louik, v. De Rosa, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 318, 194 A. 514, and Penna. Trust Co., to use, etc. v. Earnest, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 331, 1 194 A. 520; that the tax abatement Act of October 25, 1938, P. L. 88, is not available to a bidder or purchaser at sheriff’s sale, who has bid at said sale a sum sufficient to pay the taxes in full, without abatement. In that event, as it is the duty of the bidder to pay his bid to the sheriff,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogg v. LongstrethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Hoyt v. KoonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  3. Braun, Sheriff, to Use of Louik v. DerosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. DeHaven v. Roscon B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. B. L. Assn. v. Hamilton (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust Co. v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Blue Ball National Bank v. Diller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API