Legal Opinion

United States v. Gurley Refining Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1992No. J-C-87-291PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE HOWARD, Jr., District Judge.

The United States of America, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), brings this action pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. to recover the costs it has incurred in connection with the response activities related to the Gurley Oil Pit Site in Edmondson, Arkansas. The United States also seeks a declaratory judgment of defendants’ liability for all future costs it will incur in response to future releases or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  2. United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Dedham Water Company and Dedham-Westwood Water District v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. WadeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Cheryl Followell v. George Mills, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  4. In Re GurleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
  5. United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API