Legal Opinion
Hughes Tool Co. v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 18, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 3685PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff filed its complaint alleging that it is the owner of four patents and that the defendant is infringing them, and seeks to enjoin further infringement of them and to recover damages sustained, together with its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, and for such other relief as to the court may appear proper.
Specifically it alleges that it is the owner of :(1) United States Letters Patent No. 1,856,627 issued on May 3, 1932, for an. in- • vention on drill cutters; (2) • United States Letters Patent No. 1,983,316 issued on December 4, 1934, for an invention on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Hughes Tool Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Hughes Tool Co. v. United MacH. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Esco Corp. v. Hensley Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
- Wabash Corp. v. Ross Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Wabash Corp. v. Ross Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951