Legal Opinion
Esco Corp. v. Hensley Equipment Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 8, 1965No. 39806PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*864MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZIRPOLI, District Judge.
Esco Corporation, the plaintiff, is an Oregon corporation, located at Portland, Oregon. It also maintains a plant at Danville, Illinois. Esco’s business includes, among other things, the manufacture and sale of expendable products for construction equipment, such as excavating teeth and replacement points for those teeth.
Hensley Equipment Company, Inc., the defendant, is a California corporation, located at San Leandro, California. Defendant is also engaged, among other things, in the manufacture and sale of excavating teeth and replacement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Noma Lites Canada Ltd. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1975