Legal Opinion
Hills & Dales General Hospital v. Pantig
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 2011No. Docket No. 298237PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Hills and Dales General Hospital brought this action against the Huron Medical Center and two physicians, claiming that all three violated a covenant not to compete. Not surprisingly, Hills and Dales elected to file suit in Tuscola County, its home turf. The Huron Medical Center maintains its principal place of business in nearby Huron County and strenuously objected to the Tuscola County venue. The circuit court found that Huron Medical’s partial ownership of two Tuscola County-based health-care businesses justified Hills and Dales’ venue selection. We reverse and remand.
i
In 2007, Hills and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Foodland Distributors v. Al-NaimiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bourne v. Muskegon Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Salem Springs, LLC v. Salem TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Andre-Pearson v. Grand Valley Health Plan, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
- United States v. Human Services Associates, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
- Abdulla v Progressive Southeastern Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2026
- Darakjian v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.