Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Mercedes-Benz United States, LLC

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2018No. 17AP-120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Pattiann McAdams, appeals a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas entered on January 20, 2017, granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC ("Mercedes USA") and Mercedes-Benz of Easton ("Mercedes Easton") (collectively, "Mercedes"). We agree with the trial court that Mercedes successfully demonstrated that the evidence on which McAdams intended to rely to prove her claims regarding her vehicle's transmission was her own inadmissible lay opinion instead of an expert opinion and, as such, was insufficient to preserve a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McAdams v. Mercedes-Benz, USA, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API