Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property At 2659 Roundhill Drive, Alamo, California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2002No. 00-16772Published
1Opinion of the Court
283 F.3d 1146
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
REAL PROPERTY AT 2659 ROUNDHILL DRIVE, ALAMO, CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee,
Robert Fitzstephens; Wilson Young; Keith Slipper; Joseph Ippolito; Michael Thaler; Mark Schwab, Claimants-Appellees.
No. 00-16772.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 16, 2001.*
Filed March 18, 2002.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert S. Mueller, III, U.S. Attorney; Robert D. Ward, Assistant U.S. Attorney; J. Douglas Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California, San Francisco, CA, for the appellant.
Dena R.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thomas FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.