Rourk v. Brunswick County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
Plaintiffs first contend the trial court erred by excluding evidence that they received no consideration from defendant for the conveyance of the parcel of land. We do not agree.
It is well settled that except in cases of fraud, mistake, or undue influence, parol trusts or agreements will not be set up or engrafted in favor of the grantor upon a written deed conveying to the grantee the absolute title, and giving clear indication on its face that such title was intended to pass. Conner v. Ridley, 248 N.C. 714, 716, 104 S.E. 2d 845 (1958). Testimony tending to show an oral agreement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- America Potato Co. v. Jeanette Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Campbell v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Parker v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Nelson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Poston v. . BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Willis v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Gibbs v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.