Legal Opinion
Allen Archery, Inc. v. Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc., and Paul E. Shepley, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 13, 1988No. 88-1119PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Per curiam
On August 8 we granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss Paul Shepley as an appellant. The notice of appeal, under a caption that describes the case as “ALLEN ARCHERY, INC., Plaintiff” v. “PRECISION SHOOTING EQUIPMENT, INC. and PAUL E. SHEPLEY, JR., Defendants,” states: “Notice is hereby given that Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc., defendant, hereby appeals_” Citing Fed.R.App.P. 3(c) and Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., - U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 101 L.Ed.2d 285 (1988), we rejected the argument that naming Shepley in the caption of the notice cured the omission of his name from the notice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stephanie Hays and Gail MacDonald v. Sony Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- G. E. Smith & Associates, Inc., a Corporation, Centennial Associates, Ltd., Etc. v. Otis Elevator Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by40 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Barnett v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Masquerade Novelty, Inc. v. Unique Industries, Inc., and Everett Novak, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States of America, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of Chicago, William C. Bigby, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Robinson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.