City of Kalamazoo v. Kalamazoo Heat, Light & Power Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Bill by the city of Kalamazoo to enjoin tbe Kalamazoo Heat, Light & Power Company from occupying the city streets. Prom a decree for complainant, defendant appeals. On motion to strike from the files the case as settled, and to dismiss the appeal.
1Per curiam
The delay in settling the case was not due to any fault of appellant. The order for the extension of the stenographer’s notes was given immediately after the decree, and at every stage the appellant appears to have used all reasonable diligence. The delay was owing to the default of an officer of the court, and is excused, under our former rulings. Cameron v. Calkins, 43 Mich. 191; Gram v. Wasey, 45 Mich. 223; Lake Shore, etc., R. Co. v. Chambers, 89 Mich. 5. See, also, Waterman v. Bailey, 111 Mich. 571.
The case of Harrison v. Van Buren Circuit Judge, McGrath, Mand. Cas. No. 965, relied on by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cameron v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Gram v. WaseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Waterman v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCabe Bros. v. Aetna InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Perkins v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Lum v. FairbanksMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Bishop v. Judge of Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Wagner v. StateWyandot County Court of Common Pleas · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.