Legal Opinion

Gram v. Wasey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Alcona. Motion to remand the record to obtain the judge’s certificate of settlement. Injunction, accounting, etc. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Where proofs have been taken in open court in a chancery cause, an appeal taken, and an effort made to have the case settled under and within the time fixed by the statute, but which failed or was imperfectly done from circumstances not caused by or within the control of the appellant, such as the failure of a stenographer to furnish a copy of the testimony, or of the Circuit Judge to properly settle or certify to the same, the appellant may in this Court have an order extending the time to perfect his appeal, or if return has been made, the proper certificate may be obtained from the Circuit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Benedict v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  3. Wells v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  4. Truesdail v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Smith v. LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Waterman v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Peters v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Kalamazoo v. Kalamazoo Heat, Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Smith v. O'DellMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API