People v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Defendant Jimmy Lee Jackson appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of attempted residential burglary. (Pen. Code, §§ 664/459.) He contends: “I. The failure to suppress the photographic lineup is ineffective assistance of counsel, as [defendant] was denied due process by the suggestiveness of the photographic lineup. II. The trial court committed prejudicial error when it prohibited trial counsel from arguing the defendant’s demeanor.” Finding no merit to these contentions we affirm defendant’s conviction. (Pt. I, not for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Jurado)California Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. BookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. Rottanak K.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. SamplesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.