Legal Opinion

People v. Murillo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1995No. H013138PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

Statement of the Case

Defendant Joel Medina Murillo was convicted of residential burglary after a court trial. The court further found true allegations that he suffered two prior serious felony convictions. Thereafter the court struck one of the prior convictions. It sentenced defendant under the three strikes law (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i) 1 ) and imposed an eight-year term for the burglary, i.e., double the midterm because of his prior burglary conviction. (See § 667, subd. (e)(1).) However, the court declined to impose an additional five-year enhancement for that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DouangmalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. HurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. Van BurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API