Legal Opinion

Elliott v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 30, 2004No. 03-1879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Acting Chief Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action seeking separation pay that he was allegedly due in 1993, when he resigned from the United States Army rather than be discharged for misconduct. Defendant United States moved for dismissal pursuant to Rules of the Court of Federal Claims [hereinafter “RCFC”] 12(b)(1) and/or 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, judgment on the administrative record. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED.

I. Background

Plaintiff Charlie Elliott served at various ranks in the United States Army from 1986 until 1993. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Michael G. Hurick v. The Honorable John Lehman, Secretary of the U.S. NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Ainslie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacLean v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API