Legal Opinion

Gribble v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 5, 2015No. A15A0747Published

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Aaron Bradley Gribble was convicted of theft by taking. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his general demurrer. We disagree and affirm.

Gribble was charged with theft by taking. During the trial, his attorney made an oral general demurrer, alleging that the indictment failed to allege a crime under the laws of the State of Georgia. The trial court denied the motion, and this appeal followed.

A general demurrer challenges the validity of an indictment by asserting that the substance of the indictment is legally insufficient to charge any crime. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. McNair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Falagian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Pulliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API