Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1989No. 89-CA-192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

M. JOSEPH TIEMANN, Judge Pro Tempore.

This is a dispute involving arrearages for alimony pendente lite and credit for payment of community debts.

Betty Daigrepont Russell, plaintiff, and Charles J. Russell, defendant, were granted judicial separation on November 10, 1986. By a consent judgment rendered on December 3, 1986, defendant agreed to pay $250.00 per month alimony pendente lite and $600.00 a month to be applied by plaintiff to community debts. On January 29, 1988, after a hearing, the district court pronounced a judgment of divorce, however, this judgment was never reduced to writing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holliday v. HollidaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Cassidy v. CassidySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. Serrate v. SerrateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Golson v. GolsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. Caire v. CaireLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dix v. DixLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API