Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Holliday

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 31, 1978No. 60298PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

358 So.2d 618 (1978)

Vertie L. HOLLIDAY

v.

Andrew S. HOLLIDAY.

No. 60298.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 10, 1978.

Dissenting Opinion May 31, 1978.

Thomas & Dunahoe, Edwin Dunahoe, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-applicant.

Russell E. Gahagan, Gahagan & Gahagan, Natchitoches, for defendant-respondent.

MARCUS, Justice.

On April 26, 1963, plaintiff, Vertie Eagles, nee Leeper, and defendant, Andrew S. Holliday, entered into an antenuptial agreement in which they stipulated that there would be no community of acquets and gains during the existence of their contemplated marriage, choosing instead to remain…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Eals v. SwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Caldwell v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hillard v. HillardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baker v. MacLay Properties Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Frey v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Talbot v. TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. McAlpine v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API