Legal Opinion
Wilcox & Gibbs Guano Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 16, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action by the Wilcox
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a motion to strike out a part of an answer constituting a further defense to a complaint. The plaintiff brought its action in the court of common pleas for Charleston county, upon a policy of insurance, against the defendant. The summons and complaint were served 27th January, 1894. On the 6th February, 1894, Hon. I). A.' Townsend, a circuit judge of tbe state of South Carolina, granted an extension of time to defendant, within which to file its answer, to 10th March, 3894. On the 8th day of March, of the same month, the defendant hied its petition, with bond…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thompson v. Railroad CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Gordon v. GilfoilSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Insurance Co. v. Brune's AssigneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. PaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Byrd-Frost, Inc. v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Shoshone Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
- W. D. Reeves Lumber Co. v. LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918