Legal Opinion

Braselton v. Nicolas and Morris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1977No. 1194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

The defendant, Bobby Braselton, appeals from a summary judgment awarding the plaintiff, Nicolas and Morris, recovery on a past due note against him. Braselton signed the note for $17,000 for payment of legal services rendered for his wife by Mr. Nicolas in the divorce of Bonnie and Bobby Braselton. The fee as originally agreed to by the parties was for $18,000 to be paid $1,000 in cash and $1,000 each month thereafter until paid in full without interest. We reverse.

To be entitled to a summary judgment the party calling for such must come forward with proper pleadings and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Archer v. GriffithTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Harrington v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Viracola v. Dallas International BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Lampkin v. LampkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Sewell Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wootton v. Ravkind (In Re Dixon)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  3. Cordial v. Ernst & YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Dallas v. Arnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Long v. TowneNevada Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API