Legal Opinion

People v. Pulley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1981No. 62820, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

James Corzel Pulley was charged with one count of unlawful delivery of heroin and one count of conspiracy to deliver heroin. He pled guilty of attempted possession with intent to deliver heroin,1 and was sentenced to serve six to ten years imprisonment.

Pulley appealed, raising one issue: whether his *527sentence should be vacated because he was not present at an in-chambers, off-the-record presentence conference between the sentencing judge and Pulley’s attorney. The Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished opinion.2 We granted leave to appeal.

I

At the outset of the in-court sentencing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. People v. GrimmettMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. HoytMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. McCuaigMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. KaiglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API