Ross v. Golden Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Cunningham, J.,
This case is a sequel to the ejectment case between the same parties, reported in 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 234, 186 A. 249, under the title of Golden et ux. v. Ross — one difference being that the parties are now reversed. The Goldens, who were the plaintiffs in the former case, are now the defendants, and Ross, the defendant in that case, is plaintiff here.
The parties live in adjoining houses; fronting upon the north side of Aspen Street in the City of Pittsburgh and connected by a party wall. The premises of the Goldens (owned by entireties) are designated as No. 534…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lodge v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
- Rook v. GreenewaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Medara v. Du BoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Hutchison v. Little Four Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Thompson v. DeLongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002