Legal Opinion

Richard Adams v. Eureka Fire Protection Dstr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 20, 2009No. 09-1315UnpublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Per curiam

[UNPUBLISHED]

Plaintiffs Richard C. Adams, Wanda Adams, Richard M. Adams, Amanda Ogle and Eric Ogle appeal the district court’s 1 dismissal of their action alleging, inter alia, a violation of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”). Plaintiffs sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that HIPAA creates a federal right that can be enforced through § 1983. The district court dismissed the federal claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), holding that HIPAA does not create a private right of action. Having dismissed the federal claims, the district…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Acara v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Clark Lee Smith v. Julian Boyd Laverta Barns Gloria Blocker Dav KovacCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Benton v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Dodd v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Hudes v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. In re AnthonyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
  5. Maple v. Colonial Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Maple)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API