Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Graham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 2001No. F-2000-830Published

1Concurrence

LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge:

concurs in result.

1 This case presents an issue of instructional error only. Had the trial court issued OUJI-CR 2d 10-27, which is a clear and correct statement of the law, the problem would have been resolved.

12 Furthermore, this case does not present a question of first impression. See, e.g., Bland v. State, 2000 OK CR 11, 1 89, 4 P.3d 702, 726 (same argument raised, but rejected, based upon giving of OUJI-CR 2d 10-27); Washington v. State, 1999 OK CR 22, 139, 989 P.2d 960, 973 ('The jury was further instructed that it should consider first degree murder and if it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Childs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API