Legal Opinion

Nolting ex rel. Nolting v. Holt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1923No. 24,450PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one of ejectment and for partition. The plaintiffs prevailed, and the defendants appeal.

In March, 1919, James Holt, a negro, the owner of the land in controversy, 'died intestate. He left a son, Thomas Holt, and the children of a deceased daughter, as legitimate heirs. They are the defendants. The plaintiffs are mulattoes. They are sons of Hattie Nolting, a white woman, and they claimed James Holt was their father.

When the plaintiffs were conceived and born, Hattie Nolting was the wife of Charles Nolting, a white man, and was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shorten v. Judd ex rel. RunkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Lynch v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. In Re Estate of JulianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. In Re Rowe's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In re the Estate of SimpsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API