Legal Opinion

Rogge v. Gulf Oil Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1961No. 3907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

This vacancy suit is basically a boundary controversy brought as a trespass to try title action by Rogge, lessee of the State. The State as lessor intervened. They will be referred to herein as plaintiffs. Their suit is against Gulf and numerous others, who will be collectively referred to as defendants, to recover title to and possession of Rogge’s interest under an oil and gas lease covering lands in Orange County. Judgment was rendered on a jury verdict for plaintiffs as to 28 acres involved, and against them as to other lands sued for in so far as parties before us are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. ChipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Federal Royalty Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. American Surety Co. v. WhiteheadTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Horne v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Texas Portland Cement & Lime Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Casu Ex Rel. Casu v. Marathon Refining Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Bandy Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Strickland Transportation Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. R. B. Butler, Inc. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. De Anda v. De AndaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API