Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1992No. 78A01-9109-IF-273PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The State of Indiana appeals from the grant of Harrison Adams' motion to correct error, and contends the grant is contrary to law. We affirm.

The evidence favorable to the verdict reveals that Adams owned land which included a stream. Large amounts of rock, gravel, and other debris collected in the stream, especially after heavy rains and torrential floods. Adams excavated this creek rock and gravel but did not excavate the actual, natural creek bed. The State informed Adams he needed a permit for the continued excavation, but Adams refused. The State cited Adams with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foreman v. State Ex Rel. Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Hedrick v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of PlainfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1995
  2. Ridenour v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. First Federal Savings Bank of Indiana v. GalvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Whitacre v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Dalton Foundries, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API