Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Anonymous

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1997No. 45S00-9611-DI-721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Lawyers who advertise that they are specialists” in a particular area of the law must comply with the provisions of Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 30. The respondent in this disciplinary action failed to comply with those provisions and for that misconduct will receive a private reprimand. Herein, we set forth the facts and circumstances of this case in order to educate the bar with respect to provisions regarding lawyer specialist certification, while preserving the private nature of the admonishment.

The Commission charged the respondent with violating Rule 7.4(a) of…

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility v. ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility v. Connie ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API