In Re Anonymous
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charged the two attorneys subject to this action with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law by advertising themselves as "specialists" when they had not been certified as such. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the respondent attorneys have agreed with the Commission that they should be privately reprimanded for their faulty advertisement. We conclude today that a private reprimand is appropriate in this case, and therefore accept the Statement of Cireum-stances and Conditional…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In the Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- In re HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2002