Legal Opinion

In Re Anonymous

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2003No. 45S00-0301-DI-13, 45S00-0301-DI-14Published

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charged the two attorneys subject to this action with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law by advertising themselves as "specialists" when they had not been certified as such. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the respondent attorneys have agreed with the Commission that they should be privately reprimanded for their faulty advertisement. We conclude today that a private reprimand is appropriate in this case, and therefore accept the Statement of Cireum-stances and Conditional…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API