Legal Opinion
James W. Beasley v. Fairchild Hiller Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1968No. 25532PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the cause of action asserted against the appellee was timely filed. The District Court held that it was not. We affirm.
The action was filed in a Florida Circuit Court on July 20, 1966. Pursuant to an order for a more Definite Statement an amended complaint was filed September 23, 1966. The amended complaint was in two counts, the first sounding in negligence and the second on breach of implied warranty. In addition to a general denial of the material allegations of the amended complaint and the assertion of the affirmative…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Victoria St. Pierre Lartigue v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Liggett and Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Kinney v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Bates v. Cook, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1984
- Mezroub v. CapellaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.