Legal Opinion

Shumay v. Lake Chateau, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1982No. 81-938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeefe, J.

The issue before us is a circumscribed one. Does confirmation of a judicial sale in a foreclosure proceeding require an actual hearing regardless of whether it is requested by a party? In holding for Shumay, the mortgagee, the Court of Appeals rationalized that the defendants (mortgagors) were entitled to an opportunity to question the sale proceedings at a hearing, but in effect waived a hearing by making no request. The Court of Appeals also placed reliance upon the defendants’ counsel’s unqualified endorsement of the order of confirmation of sale without seeking a hearing or without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Bank Co. v. BrumbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conseco Finance Servicing v. Taylor, Unpublished Decision (5-16-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. RiddleOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API