Legal Opinion

Dominey v. Mathison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1974No. SC 523PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

This case involves a boundary dispute between neighbors. The following rough sketch may be help ful:

SE 1/4

Section 15, T.8, R.28

Henry County, Alabama

Disputed Area

G. B. Mathison, Sr. — complainant, appellee — claims all of the West 1/4 of the SE 14. Betty C. and Lamar Dominey — respondents, appellants — claim all of the East 1/4 of the SE 14, plus that part of the W 1/2 which lies east of Wells Branch and north of Craddock Spring Branch. Thus, the Bill To Establish Boundary Lines brought by Mathison focused the issue: Is the true line between the parties the N/S line dividing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fitts v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Quinnelly v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Edge v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Ex Parte Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Ancora Corp. v. Miller Oil Purchasing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Watkins v. HarperCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Century 21, Etc. v. Ala. Real Estate Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API