Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-1438PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

All teachers employed by boards of education are employed pursuant to contract.

“The board of education of each city, exempted village, local and joint vocational school district shall enter into written contracts for the employment and re-employment of all teachers. * * *” R.C. 3319.08.

The appellant and the Akron Board of Education did not execute a written contract. However, it was stipulated before the trial court that she “was employed as a substitute teacher for the Akron Public Schools during the school year 1970-71 * * The absence of a written contract is of no effect. R.C. 3319.08…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Justus v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Dennis v. Board of Education of Hillsdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Board of State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio v. Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Kehoe v. Brunswick City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. CarstaphenOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API