State v. Clagon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Indictments for first-degree burglary are not required to specifically state the underlying felony on which the burglary charge is based. Where there was sufficient circumstantial evidence of Clagon’s intent to commit assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury, the trial court did not err in denying her motion to dismiss. For Wilkins to be guilty of first-degree burglary under an acting in concert theory, the State was not required to show that Wilkins had the specific intent that Clagon assault Forrest. When viewed in their entirety, the trial court’s jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. WorsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. AngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ScarboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022